Skip to content

Understanding Your Grade

Every skill generated by SkillThis receives a letter grade from A+ to F, along with a numeric score from 0 to 100. The grade reflects how effectively an AI assistant can use the skill, not the quality of your expertise.

GradeScore RangeMeaning
A+90-100Exceptional, production-ready
A85-89Excellent with minor room for improvement
A-80-84Very good, minimal issues
B+75-79Good, a few areas to improve
B70-74Solid skill with some gaps
B-65-69Decent but needs work
C+60-64Acceptable but notable weaknesses
C55-59Below average, significant gaps
C-50-54Weak methodology
D30-49Poor, mostly abstract or minimal
F0-29Placeholder, lacks real methodology

Each grade has a color-coded badge:

  • A grades (A+, A, A-): Green - Ready for production use
  • B grades (B+, B, B-): Yellow-green - Good with minor improvements needed
  • C grades (C+, C, C-): Amber - Usable but with notable gaps
  • D grade: Orange - Needs significant improvement
  • F grade: Red - Essentially a placeholder

If your skill scores below 60 on the first generation attempt, SkillThis automatically:

  1. Analyzes the grading feedback
  2. Regenerates the skill with improvements
  3. Re-grades the improved version

This happens behind the scenes. You only see the final result. The improvement count is tracked, and the system makes one improvement attempt before showing you the result.

Along with your grade, you receive 3 specific, actionable suggestions for improvement. These tell you exactly what would raise your score.

Examples of suggestions you might see:

  • “Add concrete input/output examples showing what a candidate profile looks like before and after screening”
  • “Replace abstract advice with specific tool configurations or commands”
  • “Include a checklist for the multi-step deployment process”

The grade is based on 6 weighted criteria. See Grading Criteria for the full breakdown.

CriterionWeightQuick Check
Format Compliance15%Valid YAML frontmatter, kebab-case name, third-person description
Conciseness15%Doesn’t over-explain, assumes AI is smart
Quick Start Quality15%Immediate actionable content upfront
Workflow Quality15%Clear step-by-step process
Examples Quality20%Concrete input/output pairs
Completeness20%Edge cases, pitfalls, templates, defaults
IssueGrade ImpactFix
No Quick Start section-15 pointsLead with an immediately actionable example
First/second person in description-10 pointsUse third person (“Analyzes…” not “I analyze…”)
Abstract examples-10 pointsProvide concrete input/output pairs
Over-explaining basics-10 pointsRemove explanations the AI already knows
Missing methodologyScores 0-20Include actual step-by-step process

The most effective way to get a higher grade: provide a more detailed input. Return to skillthis.ai and try again with:

  1. More specific processes and tools
  2. A concrete example walkthrough
  3. Decision criteria you use
  4. Edge cases you handle